Friday, December 21, 2012

ინგლისურის გაკვეთილები (English Lessons)



“Quand tu veux construire un bateau, ne commence pas par rassembler du bois, couper des planches et distribuer du travail, mais reveille au sein des hommes le desir de la mer grande et large."
― Antoine de Saint-Exupéry


I started the club in October, because I had so many bright students and I wanted to be able to spend some more time with them, in a less formal setting than the regular lessons during school hours. However, my school, Tbilisi Public School 192, was huge, and I didn't know how many students would be interested. I asked for help from one of my co-teachers, Nana. She recommended I start the club with the students of class 6b, who were fairly well behaved and very enthusiastic about English.

So I started small. The first week, I wrote out the lyrics to a couple pop songs (The Beatles, Elvis, Rihanna), leaving blanks for them to try and guess what was being sung. I remembered this activity from my Spanish classes in high school, and remembered enjoying it. It's not as though Georgia doesn't import its fair share of English-language pop (although if the marshrutkas and cafes are any indication, there is an equal demand for Russian pop), but I had a hunch that these kids, bright that they may be, were like many Georgians, in that they weren't really listening to the music for the words. How else could Black Eyed Peas and Maroon 5 have become as popular as they were? I played each song a few times, to let them really get comfortable listening to the songs for the words. They all laughed a little nervously at the first song- Elvis, Hound Dog, classic- but by the third time I played it, I saw the boys sneakily shaking their hips and the girls bobbing their heads. Pop music... what better hook to get them coming back for more English club?

The next week, I decided to try something a little more challenging. I created a memory game based on what they were currently working on, the future tense by way of intention. Specifically, the phrase "going to..._______". I created a couple others, including one that paired adult animal names with the baby names (dog/puppy, cat/kitten, etc.) which was quite the hit. The thing about Georgian kids, in my experience, is that anytime you make it a game, their competitive spirit comes out and they unreservedly, unironically throw themselves into it. They're all in.






The core crew can be seen here, plus on the right, with the yellow headband, Tamari, and leaning over in the striped shirt, Esma.

By this point, I noticed that all of the boys and a few of the girls had fallen by the wayside. Sure, Serge (the lone boy, as much of an outsider as any Georgian kid is) still doggedly continued to show up, but otherwise a core group of about five girls had become the basis of my club. So I thought, as a twelve year old girl, what did I love to do? What was interested in? How did I entertain myself?

And then I remembered the origami fortune-tellers we used to make in droves, entertaining ourselves in study halls and sleepovers by creating little elaborately folded, flower-like harbingers of doom and joy, husbands and cars, jobs and children. MASH was complicated and would require excessive explanations, and these girls' English wasn't that good. But the fortune tellers? That I could sell them on.




 From left: Ani, Mari, Tekla, Qeti, and Nini.

The club usually met on Tuesdays, after the sixth grade's final lesson. The next time I was with class 6b was on Thursday, and when I walked into the class with Nana I noticed the fortune tellers immediately. They were... everywhere. All the students had one. The boys were competing by making progressively smaller and  smaller ones, seeing who could effectively fold the smallest piece of paper into the little four-sectioned puppet. All during class that day, and during the next week, I was confiscating the damn things. And the kicker? The kids had taken the concept and run with it... in Georgian. They were writing out the predictions in Georgian. It was doubtlessly a success, although more for the cultural cache than the appeal of the English language.

This semester flew by. It seemed as though the time between my first disjointed, fittingly Georgian day of school (disorganized, a great show of kindness and curiosity, hectic yet at times extremely boring) and my last was only a couple weeks. So in the second week of December, I decided it was time to make some Christmas cards. I requested English language cards, although a few girls begged to write the traditional Georgian holiday greeting (analogous to the English equivalent, which wishes a happy Christmas and New Year), "გილოცავთ შობა და ახალ წელს!" (Gilotsavt Shoba da Akhal Tsels!) 

(Esma, who skipped a bunch of the sessions in the middle of the semester, can be seen in the blue sweater in the back. She made me a lovely card that I will probably hold onto for a long, long time.)




 They're just too cute to say no to. I wish I could describe the joy on some of their faces when I told them they didn't have to give me their cards when they were done, and could in fact make the cards for their family members or even make, GASP, multiple cards!

Finally, UNO. We spent a fair amount of afternoons (about 3, I believe) playing UNO. The game of UNO was treated by these girls like a high-stakes poker game. They colluded, they shouted, they agonized over slights and delighted in triumphs. They took to it with their typical Georgian fervor and I could hardly say no when they begged to play again, week after week. And in my defense, they learned a lot of game playing terminology (my turn, whose is it?, what does this mean?, etc.) It was also decent review for colors and numbers, which although elementary lessons, they have a tendency to forget. UNO was so beloved it even brought back into the fold students I thought had abandoned me for good at the beginning of the semester.

These pictures are from our last game, played on my last day of school. UNO, an American game with a Spanish name, popular with these girls (and Serge) as much for the fun of playing as for watching me shuffle the deck, and endlessly fascinating activity that I tried every week to teach them how to do without success.

I'll miss these girls, and Dighomi Public School 192, and Tbilisi, in a way that's hard to describe eloquently. This has been a rough semester: for much of it I was ill, my commute was arduous and often inconvenient, there were a series of ups and downs while Kayla stayed with me and trying to figure out what would be my next adventure after Georgia. At the end however, I found myself sad to be leaving, and sure that I would some day look back on my time living in Tbilisi with nostalgia. It was a bittersweet emotion.


Clockwise from the sole boy in the club: Serge, Nino, Esma, Tekla, Nini, Mari, and Qeti.

If you want to build a ship, don't drum up people together to collect wood and don't assign them tasks and work, but rather teach them to long for the endless immensity of the sea.
So says Antoine de Saint-Exupéry. I can only hope that I taught these girls to long for the sea, as my best teachers did for me. Time will tell, I suppose.

Thursday, December 6, 2012

It's a thing I do, so...

When I was five, I took a dive.
When I was ten, I walked again.
When I was fifteen, I kept my motor clean.
When I was twenty, I got plenty.

When I was twenty-five...

Thursday, November 29, 2012

A Surfeit of Sunrises






Dear Georgia, please adopt Daylight Savings Time. Have mercy on a sad sack foreigner who has a long commute in the morning.

Upside: the walk to my bus stop is often breathtaking.

P.S. Despite what it might look like in that middle picture, the figure is an old man I see most mornings fishing off the side of the highway. I wonder if he ever catches anything worth eating? I should ask him sometime.

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Watched: The Women (1938 vs. 2008)



Both films have their strengths, naturally. But when the highlight in one film is Meg Ryan sitting at a kitchen table crying and eating a stick of butter and in the other it's Rosalind Russel, wearing a sparkly cape/hood/tiny hat combo, making a devious, shady friend deal with a be-bubble-bathed Joan Crawford... One of these things is better than the other. 

1938 credit sequences:










2008 credits sequence:

Now, are the 1938 credits insultingly pairing each actress/character with a corresponding zoo/wildlife animal? Yes. Are they still more entertaining and interesting than the 2008's montage of women's feet and half-hearted Terminator riff that is dropped seconds after showing up? YES. This a theme that will be continued through this blog post.

1938 Gym/Gossip sequence:




2008:



Point to 2008 for Carrie Wilson as the manipulative gossip columnist. But otherwise the 1938 workout wins for being outdated and silly and still kind of awesome in its irrelevance because when someone in the 1930's is like, EXERCISE YUCK! you can be like ha! Oh silly don't-know-any-betters but when they do it in a 2008 film it doesn't have quite the same charm.

Speaking of charm, you need to see the endlessly amazing spectacle that are the hats/fasteners/headpieces and accompanying fashions worn by the characters in the 1938 version as compared to 2008's:


Formal bald caps, for all your fancy bald cap occasions.

Yes, Rosalind Russel is wearing a shirt with 3 eyes on it paired with a flowery headpiece. And she's kind of pulling it off? What is even happening.

In which this scene is mostly notable for how frumpy/boring everyone is.


SO MANY SHOULDERPADS!!!!!!!!!

Hot cross hat.

Slapstick!
Jaunty hats.

Flaunty hats.
Well... those coats are nice...



Feathery caps.



I don't even fucking know. Bows, positioned to look like satin antennae? This was a look that happened in 1938, it would seem.

Pilgrims.

There is nothing about this scene I did not love. Boozing ladies on the night train to Reno? Check. Out heroine wearing a hairstyle that CLEARLY inspired the iconic costume design for Princess Leia? Check. Behooded and bebanged extra? Check. Giant fucking bouquet tacked onto the crazy elder lady's hilariously over the top fur coat? YES OF COURSE.

Did I mention that this happened? I may have mentioned it already. But to reiterate... this happened.


By the way, this is the 2008 version of that. Snore. Look, it's not that Eva Mendes is not as beautiful as Joan Crawford. She totally is. It's just that Joan Crawford is a force of nature, even in an ensemble cast, she just goes for broke as the eeeeevil [twirls mustache] gold digging other woman. And Eva Mendes tries, bless her heart, but she's just... not.

And of course no from from the 1930's, regardless of genre, is complete without a fancy, (preferably shiny) lady turban. It simply isn't done, darling.

Blowouts, yay. I guess.

And while we're here and talking about fashion let's just take a minute to compare the wildly unnescessary and only passingly relevant fashion shows featured in both movies. Because there is quite the disparity there. And while the 2008 version at least tried to enfold this event into the plot (Meg Ryan's character is a fashion designer who strikes out on her own to create a line after she's fired from her father's company/her husband starts cheating on her with Eva Mendes, it's a whole thing), I think it somehow works better in the 1938 version BECAUSE it's not explained and it's so bizarre and left feld and just, why? Why are we even watching this? Why does a film that is supposedly about some sort of empowerment/honesty among and for woman have a 12 minute fashion show in the middle, besides condescenion? Don't get me wrong here. I LOVE THE FASHION SHOW (at least in the 1930's version). Because it is insane. And maybe that's what's intended. But I sort of suspect that the idea was more, hey it's a movie for women! It's not enough that all the characters are dressed outlandishly in every scene, better put some models in dressing even MORE outlandishly! In Technicolor! That being said:


HAND BROOOOOCH WHY NOT ME?! I love that the piece of jewelry has its own jewelry. Details.

More pilgrim hats, was this seriously that popular of a look back then? Also: floor length bathing gowns and antebellum style hair nets because in what else would you go to the beach?

To stomach is cool though, you can show that off. As long as the neck and ears are covered, you're good to go.

I confess, I want that green coat. I want it. Even if it means wearing that stupid hat with it.

There's a zoo sequence. It's a whole thing, I think it's supposed to tie back into the credits and the whole women/zoo animals analogy that is pretty insulting , which I am going to excuse as a product of its time and from which I will now attempt to move on and not rant or rave about.

Tell me this is not inspiration for the restaurant scene in Terry Gilliam's Brazil, where the society matrons are wearing shoes on their heads, and I will tell you that I do no believe you.

SHOULDERPADS


It's so hideous it defies words.

Antebellum...

And back to pilgrims.

Which naturally progresses into this. This outfit is fine, I guess, whatever... Mostly I took this picture to try and capture the clear plastic hair container she is wearing on her head.

Do you see it? It's like a Tupperware container. Formal Tupperware. As you do.

I do actually kind of love this...



But not as much as I loved this. All of it, every piece. I want to own it. And I want to walk around all day striking the same exact poses that this model does. Because she is a treasure.






That last dress is stunning, otherwise this entire sequence is total snoozeville. Was stuff just really boring in 2008? Was that just a thing we were collectively doing at that point in time? I can't remember.

Dressing room confrontation:

I... yeah.


I have to give the 2008 version props, they win when it comes to comparing the gossipy help characters. Because crochety Cloris Leachman is pretty great even when she's kind of annoying.



And Debi Mazar is pretty great as well, so I'll give the 2008 version the manicure/revelation scene.






Since women in 2008 do not have to take the night train to Reno in order to divorce their husbands, the movie instead has Meg Ryan go to some kind of wellness ranch spa business, where she smokes pot with Bette Midler. Which is pretty good, but is it as good as this cowboy hat?



Or this kick fight? I don't know. We'll call that one a draw.

Some more fashion choices from 2008:

Frumps.

Box-shaped.

Forgettable.

Why is it when the 1930's character does those buns it's fantastic, and when they do it on Debra Messing it's a mess? Maybe it's the tiny neck-bandage scarf, haus-frau muumuu and colossal pocketbook?

UGH.

STOP DOING THAT MOVIE. WHAT DID DEBRA MESSING EVER DO TO YOU?!




Just... so bland.

Not to mention the movie ends with this: 


Poor Debra Messing.

This poster also gets treated as a legitmate plot point. As in, Meg Ryan makes a dream board and we're treating to a 5 minute montage of this happening. Right before the super boring fashion show. How does the 1930's version end?

Sass.

Forced closeting.

This dress.

These faces. OH THE DRAMA.

That legendary last word, "There's a name for you, ladies, but it isn't used in high society... outside of a kennel."

This line gets recycled in the first few minutes of the 2008 version, but without all the buildup it's really got no punch. Plus it's said by some nameless faceless character and not... Joan Crawford.

In conclusion, am I biased because the clothes in the original The Women are alternatively enviably beautiful and absurdly ridiculous, and therefore I want all of them? YES. Yes I am. But is it also a far superior movie because it uses the madcap, rattling, fast-paced, word-play heavy format of the 30's comedy to shine a little light on the many ways women operate against and with each other? Yes. Is the original also fairly offensive in it stereotypes? Does that therefore make the transferred elements all the worst in the 2008 version, where there is no excuse for that kind of ignorant, boring, ugly depiction of women? And does the original work 1000%  than the 2008 version's because the attempt to give the same story, with its same plot beats and characters, an entirely different storytelling sensibility, replete with 21st century bland, romantic dramedic strains is a god awful idea? Yes. Yes. Yes. Sorry, everyone involved. I get that it's attempting to honor and update something great. But some things are like a peacock-feathered pilgrim-looking hat paired with a shimmering floor length gown: they're of their time, and any attempt to pull that trick a second time is doomed to fail.